The quarter-end LP package, built from your administrator's PDFs instead of from forwarded emails

Your capital accounts, portfolio KPIs, fee and expense detail and fund-level performance land in the same warehouse, so the package fills from systems instead of from forwarded emails, and ILPA Reporting Template v2.0 output starts from your data rather than a copy-paste. The ILPA Performance Template, released in January 2025 and updated to v1.1 that April, applies to funds that commenced operations on or after January 1, 2026, with the first delivery due for Q1 2027 after four full quarters, so a fund that started this year is capturing for it already. Synopsis does not replace your fund administrator; it joins and reconciles what the administrator, the monitoring platform and the CRM each hold.

Yes, and that is the normal case below roughly $500M in AUM, where a third-party administrator books the fund on its own tenant and the GP gets a portal login rather than a database. Capital account statements, fee schedules and quarterly reports arrive as PDF or Excel and get parsed into tables in your warehouse, tied to your own ledger, so the statement and your books read side by side. The administrator stays the system of record for the fund's books.

ILPA released version 2.0 of the Capital Call and Distribution Template on September 11, 2025. Funds that adopt the new ILPA Performance Template use it for funds launched on or after Q1 2026, with the first delivery due in Q1 2027. Every other fund uses it for funds launched on or after Q1 2027. Your administrator still issues the notices. Synopsis holds the call and distribution detail from those statements next to your own ledger, so you can check a notice against your records before it goes out and answer an LP question about any line on it.

Yes. Juniper Square investor records and your administrator's capital account statements land in one warehouse keyed to the same fund and LP, so variances surface before the quarterly package goes out. The same holds for Carta, Allvue, Anduin, Passthrough, Chronograph, and the rest of a fund's systems.

Usually, yes. The AI builds the connector from an export or an API, and a new system is typically flowing in days. If it can produce a file, it is a candidate.

Your first connected systems are answering questions in about 48 hours, and a full rollout lands in days, not a multi-quarter data project.

No. We configure your warehouse with you and connect the systems you already run; your team just asks questions in plain English. Nobody has to write SQL or babysit pipelines unless they want to.

No. Your systems of record — ERP, CRM, accounting, and the rest — stay exactly where they are. Synopsis sits on top and joins them into one place you can query, so you report across everything instead of exporting from each tool.

Your data stays in your own warehouse — we don't keep a copy. Access is governed per user and every query is audit-logged. Synopsis is SOC 2 Type II, and you can review our live security posture in the Trust Center.

BI tools chart data that something else already had to clean and join. Synopsis does that upstream work — connecting your systems, resolving entities, and enforcing your metric definitions — then answers in plain English, builds the dashboards, and traces every number back to its source.